Not been reported from the Notes to the draft revision process - the people the right to education and national educational ...

 Not been reported from the Notes to the draft revision process - the people the right to education and the state the right to education
Shaohua by: day before yesterday in the blog I wrote an article on of , can not be modified to this blog comment on a newspaper published in the paper yet. so I tried it a try, send the word excision into 1700, dissemination, should take more responsibility, to be more rigorous. So the night to consider, first, send an e-mail tracking - Please do not use the; Second, do a modification. I later chose to do a modified This gain some more, so the meeting whether or not reported.
editorial this morning received a letter last night:
Ma, Hello!
article I agree and would like to use, but the leaders said to peoples against each other, not work. You can see other places to issue, thank you for your support.
I am grateful for this response. In addition to my respect, I also get another message: that for this paper, we have the most open country boundary where the scale of the media.
I do in the stick it out because it is more than the day before the corresponding notes in the space, scale and language closer to the standards adopted by the newspaper. friends are interested, you can compare.
people the right to education and the state the right to education - I see Meng Mu Tang storm (Final)
The controversy has two aspects: First results of the education problem, and second, the right to education. neither should be separated to talk about, and difficult to completely separate.
effect of issues related to what the standard is not good to generalize. admitted to the University is an effect, , also in the home or private school in the completion.
why the education effect can not be completely separated with the right to talk about education? Because there is no right of access to education, not only the lack of state support and convergence of institutional resources, and will be the state system of oppression, can not achieve its original effect can be achieved.
I think people already have the right to education - namely: how to determine their right to education, not just the Education Act have expressed The right to education. This is almost a , but only that the authoritarian era of this right without depriving the people will be able to maintain authoritarian; and indeed the modern state to deprive the people of this right to achieve other goals, such as improving the quality of the whole people, prosperity of the country, as well as social control.
modern national education system began in the era of the Prussian Bismarck, making it the superior effect of law, democratic countries like the United States are competing to follow. It is the national goal of education and this close relationship, making the state-controlled education, and even the monopoly Education has become an inevitable choice. people have the right to decide how to educate their children; but the state is counting on to help these kids to win in international competition. This contradiction is the modern state and the people of the basic contradiction between the rights and freedoms. in a dictatorship a long history, China's traditional planned economy, filled with the Chief of the arbitrary color is more obvious. It is this that causes people's reverse psychology. of monopoly on education and social life of the monopoly of other linked unpleasant. the education sector, should be able to understand this psychological confrontation.
fact, there is that management costs. to face a choice every system is simply impossible.
Indeed, since in modern times, although the rights of the people more secure than ever before, society is more diverse than before (- in China since reform and opening up), but the traditional ; home education stage, some pioneers to many conflicts and the authorities. - translated and published in the country last year, and also other rights such as the popular movement for the same effort to get through a long period and has a cultural tradition, social organizations and legal support. and these, in our country still do not have the condition. in the right to education, civil and institutional The conflict has only just begun.
my last semester in the school organized training courses for teachers of English, an American teacher is ; of American parents talk to us. all of our problems are questioned: the child will not mind closed? how the quality of education they receive? there was a matriarch to her two answer our questions. These two little girls conspicuous appearance, regaling, this in itself is the best answer to our doubts.
parents told us: Even if not in school, their children and other children still have many opportunities for exchanges, such as church activities, community activities, and so on. And with this comparison, we Chinese children's their lives are conditions.
people the right to education and the state the right to education - I see Meng Mu Tang storm (first submission)
interest argument still does not. I think, involving related criteria: admitted to the University is an effect, officials to effect of education can not be completely separated in education talk about it right? because br> I think that people already have the right to education - is the right to determine their own educational methods, not just expressed in the Education Act have the right to education. This should be a There are provable in history. But the modern national education system has in fact deprived of this right. This is not a modern state than in the authoritarian era that still authoritarian, but rather that the authoritarian era of this right does not require people to be able to maintain authoritarian; and deprive the people of the modern state really need this right to achieve other goals, such as improving the quality of the whole people, prosperity of the country. modern national education system began in the era of the Prussian Bismarck, making it the superior effect of law, democratic countries like the United States imitated. It is the national goal of education and this close relationship, making the state-controlled education, and even the monopoly of education has become an inevitable choice. people have the right to decide how to educate their children; but the state are looking to develop in these children make Missile God people. This contradiction is the modern state and the people of the basic contradiction between the rights and freedoms. in a dictatorship a long history, filled with the traditional planned economy in China, the Chief of arbitrary color is more obvious. It is this that causes people's reverse psychology. on freedom of education more obvious in our country, that is, the ideology of national education. Our public schools although the exam-oriented education and practical utilitarian tendency is very obvious, but many of the ideological and political education content, are far beyond the ; the content. The content on more secure than ever before, society is more diverse than before (- in China since reform and opening up), but the traditional fight for the rights of the American people again, from the beginning of 70 century. states have been legitimate. In some states, This has introduced. Clearly, in a pluralistic society like the United States, most reflect the people's right to education community organizations and legal support. and these, in our country still do not have the condition. in the right to education, civil conflict with the system has only just begun.
still do not have a condition that our social life or not open and rich, it does make that , he also attracted several The two told us: Even if not in school, their children and other children still have a lot of interaction opportunities, such as church activities, community activities, and so on. And with this comparison, we Chinese children's social interaction .
people's right to education and the state the right to education - I patriotic education not learn full-time private school?. Comments contention in three points: First, the legality of full-time private school; Second, the second is whether the main contractor of compulsory education in public schools only? Third, private schools and even family can carry out patriotic education? One last point closest to person's common sense, so becomes the most powerful - he cites the example of Yuemucizi. because the last point reduced his most powerful, so did the title. In fact, the issues involved Meng Mu Tang, this issue is far more complex than, This problem can not be replaced.
; of social controversy has two aspects: First results of the education problem, and second, the right to education, that is, the legality of Hemming said.
full-time private school, effect, I always had doubts that he is; Central Television reporter did a show, the reporter interviewed a and poor communication skills was a little incoherent, it deepened and reinforced my doubts. Of course this is just a case. But as a direct feel of the argument, clearly supports the argument suspect.
The other dimension - the right to education. I certainly support the people have a clear right to education - the right to determine their own educational methods, not just expressed in the Education Act the right to education. this right, I think a history of national culture is a license, not self-evident, despite the modern state education system has in fact deprived of this right.
course, the modern state, but also other aspects have been deprived of many ancient people the right to authoritarian era, including the right there. This is not to say that the modern state than in the authoritarian era still authoritarian, but rather that the authoritarian era not deprive the people of this right will be able to maintain the autocratic; the needs of the modern state is to deprive the people of this right to achieve other goals, such as improving the quality of the whole people, prosperity of the country. modern national education system began in Bismarck, the Prussian era, it makes the superior effect of law, democratic countries like the United States are competing to follow. made our country through science and education, are also mean it.
education and national goals is the close relationship that makes state-controlled education, and even the monopoly of education has become an inevitable choice. people have the right to decide how to educate their children; but the state is counting on these God allows the missile to cultivate children's talents. This conflict is a modern country and the people's basic right to freedom of contradiction. in a dictatorship a long history, filled with the traditional planned economy in China, the Chief of arbitrary color is more obvious. It is this that causes people The reverse psychology. of consumption as interference in freedom of the people many people's minds unfair, because people generally have sympathy for the weak psychological, not to mention the parents simply want to better educate their children. the education sector, should understand and appreciate this kind of psychological confrontation.
fact, there is that in the more obvious in our country, that is, the ideology of national education. Our public schools although the exam-oriented education and practical utilitarian tendency is very obvious, but the goals of education and educational policy is a clear successor to foster the cause of socialism, in the past said to be ; red successor implementation, mainly education administrative departments can not control. costs too much.
Indeed, since in modern times, although the people's rights to previously more secure, more diverse society than ever before (- China since reform and opening up onwards), but the traditional has been recognized as the state system. the past 10 years is the rapid development of home education. these cases in the ) and ; home schooling and these, in our country still do not have the conditions, as I pointed out in the recent article Dr. Li Yinhe legal rights for homosexuals as for marriage, do not have the social conditions.
still do not have a condition that Our social life is still not open and rich, it does allow those in the in their own home Teachers are Americans, they also attracted a number of friends from the United States to the classroom to talk to us. very clever, we contacted several ; home education and let her two doubt the best answer.
Why is this? Are they not the lack of social interaction it? answer our parents: Yes. if not in school, they still have a lot of other children the opportunity of exchanges, such as church activities, community activities, and so on. This makes me feel a bit adults, their lives are comment on the reason. But I people in society discussions in Meng Mu Tang is delighted that the controversy about it and the different views is a good thing. This is and is really the problem. These issues touch on the relationship between the state and the level of the people, touched people's right to border issues touched on education issues sent to multiple. the views of the Ministry of Education, sufficient authority, but is unlikely to The world interest rate meeting